In corporate financing, inflation is often considered an inevitable force that can be hedged but never escapes. Every fiscal model, investment paper and capital plan will eventually bend around it. But the way we measure inflation is rarely questioned.
this Consumer Price Index (CPI)the world’s default inflation scale, uses fiat currency to measure the price changes of a basket of commodities. But here’s the problem: fiat currency is designed to lose its value. This means we are measuring price increases by shrinking yardage.
Now, Samara Assets Groupexecutive member of the company Bitcoin (BFC), is challenging.
They launched The world’s first Bitcoin Consumer Price Index (BTCCPI)– A bold new benchmark that is priced on the same CPI basket with Bitcoin rather than Fiat. It’s a subtle shift with far-reaching implications: Bitcoin is not only an asset, but it could be a better measure of value.
A non-melt code
Think of CPI as a thermometer – the rise in mercury continues to increase only due to increased heat and due to damage to scales.
Traditional CPI always tends toward the upward trend, not necessarily because commodities become more valuable, but because the purchasing power of Fiat currency is constantly eroded by inflation policies.
Samara’s BTCCPI flipped the frame.
By expressing the same CPI basket in Bitcoin, the index reflects what happens when measurements are made against non-supervised currency standards for supply restrictions. What it reveals is amazing: in the long run, the price trend is downward.
BTCCP does not ignore Bitcoin’s volatility, but it is rebuilt. In the short-term window, prices fluctuate. However, over a longer time frame, Bitcoin has far more purchasing power than Fiat.
It’s not just a remark of inflation. This is a more honest way to assess whether capital has its value or is silently diluted.
What does this mean for corporate treasury bonds
The company’s financial team thinks about performance, preservation and predictability. But preservation is the most difficult to measure, especially in Fiat terminology.
BTCCP provides a new tool for emerging Bitcoin Treasury companies: a method of benchmarking The power of the real world Their treasury strategy.
A company that holds Bitcoin on its balance sheet not only needs to make speculative bets, but also aligns its capital with the monetary system placed in the structure.
This changes the story you can tell shareholders.
It reinforces the idea that your Treasury can not only survive inflation, but also resist it. You fix the company’s value on the basic layer of global, neutral, and honest.
From this perspective, BTCCPI is more than just a chart. This is a signal. The tool to convey value preservation in a world where most assets quietly erode.
Why is Samara’s actions important
Many companies talk about inflation. Samara has established a new way of measuring it.
They launch BTCCPI is not a thought experiment or marketing stunt. It’s one Real-time, data-driven benchmarks– Transparent, methodologically basic and free to use to the public.
This is what the leadership of Bitcoin in the corporate network emphasizes.
Samara shows how a Bitcoin local company can contribute to the wider corporate financial toolkit, namely building infrastructure that provides services to investors, treasurers, analysts and decision makers outside of business.
It also marks something deeper: The Bitcoin is no longer content with defense. It is building a new system that includes new indicators, new leverage and new standards of truth.
Towards a new benchmark for honest capital
The CFO always relies on trusted benchmarks: CPI, LIBOR, 10-year yield, S&P. However, each world reflects a world built on legal assumptions.
Bitcoin offers something different. A fixed supply, issuance monetary system is transparent and does not manipulate value through policy or politics.
Samara’s BTCCPI is one of the first attempts to use the system as lensnot just ledger.
It invites us to ask: What if we keep measuring inflation incorrectly? What if the signal we use to manage capital is inherently distorted?
What if there is a better benchmark, not only inflation, but honest capital?
Thanks to Samara, we now have the beginning of the answer.
