Below is a summary of my recent article Achieve harmony during interruption.
If your AI roadmap ignores bees, bats, or Taoist forests, then you are not designing the future, you are just automating Human Massive blindness.
Most leaders are designed for efficiency. There are very few designs in life. The dream time of the Aboriginal people tells the story of the creator of the rainbow snake of the river, the carrier of various colors, and the symbol of the unity of nature. But this is not a fabulous myth. It is a system-level reminder that thriving comes from diversity, not dominance.
Modern biology agrees. As Ed Yong explains, each species inhabits its own world of umwelt-its. Bats draw space through Echo. Bees see UV targets on petals that we cannot see. For microorganisms, a stationary pond is a bustling city of chemical signals. Nature is not unified, it is diversified. We just forgot to see.
Culture reflects this. Spiral power diagram Human Development is a color of a series of values representing the worldview. When a worldview occupies supreme, conflict breaks out. As Van Rijmenam said, true maturity is integration: not flat differences, but weaving them into harmony. Indigenous and Eastern traditions echo this – this is the forest of Tagore’s interdependent species, or the Tao between Yang and Yang.
This is not soft philosophy. This is the operating manual for exponential time. As AI, quantum calculatesynthetic biology rewrite rules, we must decide: Will we design dominance or design prosper each other?
That’s why we need biocentricism rather than anthropocentricism – as a lens for the future. Every life form has its own value and purpose. Technology should not only serve Human convenient. It should enhance the resilience, diversity and depth of life.
Three core changes have occurred:
Umwelt teaches that perceptual shaping design – our tools must adapt to reality that we do not see directly.
Helical dynamics suggest that social progress comes from synthesis, not singularity.
Biocentrism retells a question from “What can we do automation? “To “Whose world are we affecting?” ”
In short: Build vertical, patient and purpose-driven like nature.
When we shape the tools of tomorrow, will we be Ecosystem In my mind, or the biggest voice? I would love to hear your thoughts: How do we bring this mindset to the board and codebase?
To read the full text, please continue thedigitalspeaker.com
Why technology requires souls to appear first on DataFloq post.
